Blood cultures - do they make a difference to patient management?
Blood cultures are an expensive test, and optimising the pathway requires considerable effort and commitment. Is it worth the trouble? We looked at 102 consecutive episodes of bacteraemia with clinical
details in microbiology system, excluding contaminants and deduplicated to see how it affected patient management.
To spoil the ending, these are the conclusions :
Conclusions
A positive blood culture significantly altered management in 72/102 cases of significant bacteraemia
This was on the basis of
Gram stain 27 cases
Culture 25 cases
Sensitivities 20 cases
There may be debate as to the proportion of septic patients who are bacteraemic (anywhere from 10% to 95% depending on what you believe), but even if we take the lower end of this as being true, bacteraemia would seem an important way of influencing management, even if it is just prompting the microbiologist to get out of the lab and go and review the patient.
Effect on diagnosis
Blood cultures had a significant
impact on diagnosis in 25 cases (25%)
In
18 cases this was predominantly on the basis of the gram stain
In
7 cases this was predominantly on the basis of culture results
Review of incorrect
diagnosis
In 15 cases the initial diagnosis was wrong and was modified
on the basis of the blood culture result
In 10 cases
the diagnosis was switched on the basis of the gram stain
In 5 cases
the diagnosis was switched on the basis of the culture
Initial diagnosis when wrong
CAP
|
6
|
UTI
|
4
|
HAP
|
2
|
Neutropenic sepsis
|
1
|
Cellulitis
|
1
|
Endocarditis
|
1
|
Corrected diagnosis when
initially wrong
UTI
|
5
|
Cryptic
|
2
|
Endocarditis
|
1
|
Infected ulcer
|
1
|
Infected prosthetic
joint
|
1
|
Septic arthritis
|
1
|
Cholecystitis
|
1
|
CAP
|
1
|
Abdominal infection
|
1
|
Discitis
|
1
|
Review of uncertain
diagnosis
In 10 cases, the blood culture suggested a cause of
infection that was not otherwise apparent.
In 8 cases
this was suggested from the gram stain
In 2 cases
this was suggested from the culture results
Final diagnosis when initially uncertain
Line infection
|
3
|
Septic arthritis
|
2
|
UTI
|
1
|
Surgical site infection
|
1
|
Discitis
|
1
|
Cellulitis
|
1
|
Abdominal infection
|
1
|
Effect on antibiotic
usage
In 47 cases when the diagnosis was supported by the blood
culture, antibiotics were changed on the basis of the result and microbiologist
review
Narrowed
|
20
|
Broadened
|
11
|
Switched
|
11
|
Started
|
5
|
The switch was instigated on the basis of :
gram
|
9
|
organism
|
18
|
sensitivity
|
20
|
Narrowed :
taz to amox
|
3
|
Amox/gent to amox
|
2
|
gent to amox
|
2
|
flu to amox
|
1
|
Co-amox/clari to amox
|
1
|
Mero to trim.
|
1
|
Not recorded
|
1
|
Taz to fluclox
|
1
|
mero to cipro
|
1
|
mero to mtz
|
1
|
Broadened
Metronidazole added to fluclox
|
2
|
gent r to mero
|
2
|
amox to cef
|
1
|
taz to mero - res gent taz
|
1
|
fluclox to taz
|
1
|
Switched
taz R switched to cipro
|
1
|
cef r to cip
|
1
|
taz to teic line lock
|
1
|
fluclox to amox
|
1
|
These were the organisms : |
1
|
Coliform
48
Other
18
Haemolytic streptococcus
11
S. aureus
9
anaerobe
6
Pneumococcus
5
Faecal streptococcus
5
UTI
|
41
|
Cholecystitis
|
11
|
Cryptic
|
11
|
Cellulitis
|
7
|
CAP
|
6
|
Line infection
|
5
|
Septic arthritis
|
5
|
Abdominal infection
|
3
|
Infected prosthetic joint
|
2
|
Infected ulcer
|
2
|
Discitis
|
2
|
Infected pressure ulcer
|
2
|
Surgical site infection
|
1
|
Mycotic aneurysm
|
1
|
Endocarditis
|
1
|
SBP
|
1
|
Diverticulitis
|
1
|
Comments
Post a Comment